<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging My Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; Parallel Structures in Creation Stories</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-35210</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; Parallel Structures in Creation Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-35210</guid>
		<description>[...] on the other, I would argue that J is relying on P, because I think P is earlier than J (see some of my arguments). But I don&#8217;t think we are forced to see such a relationship here. But I also don&#8217;t see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on the other, I would argue that J is relying on P, because I think P is earlier than J (see some of my arguments). But I don&#8217;t think we are forced to see such a relationship here. But I also don&#8217;t see [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; The Covenant at Sinai</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-32563</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; The Covenant at Sinai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-32563</guid>
		<description>[...] remembering previous conversations accurately), Steve sees both as post-exilic. As I have argued before, I think PT is pre-exilic while HS is post-exilic. If this is the case, then it suggests a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] remembering previous conversations accurately), Steve sees both as post-exilic. As I have argued before, I think <acronym title="Priestly Torah">PT</acronym> is pre-exilic while <acronym title="Holiness School">HS</acronym> is post-exilic. If this is the case, then it suggests a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; The Late Date of P</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-29388</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; The Late Date of P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-29388</guid>
		<description>[...] this past spring that some elements of P are pre-exilic while others are post-exilic.  (See also my post from summer 2006.)  These two layers correspond to Israel Knohl&#8217;s PT and HT respectively.  Even if we date [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] this past spring that some elements of P are pre-exilic while others are post-exilic.  (See also my post from summer 2006.)  These two layers correspond to Israel Knohl&#8217;s <acronym title="Priestly Torah">PT</acronym> and HT respectively.  Even if we date [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; The Elusive Yahwist</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-28205</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; The Elusive Yahwist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/blogging-my-research/#comment-28205</guid>
		<description>[...] I have mentioned before, I think that P is composed some time during the preexilic period. D is also preexilic, with at least the law code formulated by the 8th century. Deuteronomy 4-11 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I have mentioned before, I think that P is composed some time during the preexilic period. D is also preexilic, with at least the law code formulated by the 8th century. <a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Deuteronomy+4-11&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Deuteronomy 4-11</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
