<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hurvitz on the Dating of the Priestly Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred Glynn</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-114306</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Glynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-114306</guid>
		<description>If P was written by several different authors over a number of centuries, some of it may well have been written prior to Ezekiel and some of it after Ezekiel.

it might well be asked why Ezekiel let his failed "prophecies" regarding Tyre and Egypt stand.  it is possible that he was not prophesying but, rather, was praising or encouraging Nebucchadnezzar by predicting his victories on several ventures Ezekiel knew were favorite projects--and that, by so doing, was buying Nebucchadnezzar's favor for himself and for his fellow exiles.

As for Ezekiel's opening vision, it is likely that what he was describing was one of the sandstorms that occur every July, even to this day.  The sand is very fine and glitters and it is possible that one could see mirages in them.

It is further possible that Ezekiel's detailed knowledge of Tyre's international trading partners was gained from the House of Murashu whose headquarters were on the Chebar Canal.

It is difficult to imagine that Yahweh thought that he was communicating effectively using the means which Ezekiel describes.  If Yahweh intended for the Bible to inform humans, chosen or otherwise, as to which courses of action He desired them to take, the means of communication He chose seem peculiarly poorly suited to the task--not to mention His often abysmal choice of representatives to relay His messages.

It would be absurd to say that an omnipotent and omniscient God could have been "too busy" to speak directly to those whose behavior he wished to direct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If P was written by several different authors over a number of centuries, some of it may well have been written prior to Ezekiel and some of it after Ezekiel.</p>
<p>it might well be asked why Ezekiel let his failed &#8220;prophecies&#8221; regarding Tyre and Egypt stand.  it is possible that he was not prophesying but, rather, was praising or encouraging Nebucchadnezzar by predicting his victories on several ventures Ezekiel knew were favorite projects&#8211;and that, by so doing, was buying Nebucchadnezzar&#8217;s favor for himself and for his fellow exiles.</p>
<p>As for Ezekiel&#8217;s opening vision, it is likely that what he was describing was one of the sandstorms that occur every July, even to this day.  The sand is very fine and glitters and it is possible that one could see mirages in them.</p>
<p>It is further possible that Ezekiel&#8217;s detailed knowledge of Tyre&#8217;s international trading partners was gained from the House of Murashu whose headquarters were on the Chebar Canal.</p>
<p>It is difficult to imagine that Yahweh thought that he was communicating effectively using the means which Ezekiel describes.  If Yahweh intended for the Bible to inform humans, chosen or otherwise, as to which courses of action He desired them to take, the means of communication He chose seem peculiarly poorly suited to the task&#8211;not to mention His often abysmal choice of representatives to relay His messages.</p>
<p>It would be absurd to say that an omnipotent and omniscient God could have been &#8220;too busy&#8221; to speak directly to those whose behavior he wished to direct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 18:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Deut. 16 is about pilgrimage holidays only.

Neh. 8 - it may be that Yom Kippur was "important" enough that it was not forgotten, unlike Sukkot which had to be "reinstituted". There is a precedent, so to speak, in the observance patterns of many modern Jews...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Deut.+16&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Deut. 16</a> is about pilgrimage holidays only.</p>
<p><a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Neh.+8&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Neh. 8</a> - it may be that Yom Kippur was &#8220;important&#8221; enough that it was not forgotten, unlike Sukkot which had to be &#8220;reinstituted&#8221;. There is a precedent, so to speak, in the observance patterns of many modern Jews&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>What is then difficult for me to understand (assuming a pre-exilic P that pre-dates D) is why, e.g., the post-exilic Neh. 8 doesn't seem to mention Yom Kippur (or, arguably, Yom Teruah as Yom Teruah) in a place where it would seem to be demanded if they knew of it; or why (the supposed later) Deut. 16 doesn't mention either Yom Teruah or YK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is then difficult for me to understand (assuming a pre-exilic P that pre-dates D) is why, e.g., the post-exilic <a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Neh.+8&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Neh. 8</a> doesn&#8217;t seem to mention Yom Kippur (or, arguably, Yom Teruah as Yom Teruah) in a place where it would seem to be demanded if they knew of it; or why (the supposed later) <a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Deut.+16&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Deut. 16</a> doesn&#8217;t mention either Yom Teruah or YK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyHebrew.com &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival VII</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>DailyHebrew.com &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival VII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/06/hurvitz-on-the-dating-of-the-priestly-source/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>[...] Gregory Mobley&#8217;s The Empty Men does not include Charles Halton, Kevin Wilson debates Hurvitz concerning the ABCs of P and H, and Chris Spinks endorses A Beginner&#8217;s Guide to NT Exegesis by Richard Erickson. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gregory Mobley&rsquo;s The Empty Men does not include Charles Halton, Kevin Wilson debates Hurvitz concerning the ABCs of P and H, and Chris Spinks endorses A Beginner&rsquo;s Guide to <acronym title="New Testament">NT</acronym> Exegesis by Richard Erickson. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
