<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EABS Conference IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/08/eabs-conference-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/08/eabs-conference-iv/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; Tuesday at the SBL</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/08/eabs-conference-iv/#comment-33439</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; Tuesday at the SBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/08/eabs-conference-iv/#comment-33439</guid>
		<description>[...] land unfulfilled in the Priestly document. Although it was a good paper, I disagree with her. As I argued in a paper last year at the EABS, I think there is a good deal of P in Joshua 13-21. But I do agree with Boorer that at some point [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] land unfulfilled in the Priestly document. Although it was a good paper, I disagree with her. As I argued in a paper last year at the <acronym title="European Association of Biblical Studies">EABS</acronym>, I think there is a good deal of P in <a href="http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Joshua+13-21&amp;vnum=yes&amp;version=nrsv" title="New Revised Standard Version">Joshua 13-21</a>. But I do agree with Boorer that at some point [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
