<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Priests and the Pentateuch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Christian</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-22806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-22806</guid>
		<description>Dear Kevin,

I believe the paper on which you comment was delivered by Reinhard Achenbach rather than K. Schmid.

All the best,

Mark Christian
University of the South

Priests and the Pentateuch
Posted by Kevin A. Wilson on 12 Dec 2006 2:53 pm. Filed under History , Priests , Source Criticism , Pentateuch , Bible. 
...

At this year’s SBL, Konrad Schmid gave a paper entitled “The History of Pentateuch Redaction and the Development of Sacerdotal Institutions.” His thesis was that we have to pay attention to the priesthood at the same time as we focus on the development of the Torah. Although he focused on the exilic and postexilic periods, I am currently considering the same issue for the preexilic period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kevin,</p>
<p>I believe the paper on which you comment was delivered by Reinhard Achenbach rather than K. Schmid.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Mark Christian<br />
University of the South</p>
<p>Priests and the Pentateuch<br />
Posted by Kevin A. Wilson on 12 Dec 2006 2:53 pm. Filed under History , Priests , Source Criticism , Pentateuch , Bible.<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>At this year’s <acronym title="Society of Biblical Literature">SBL</acronym>, Konrad Schmid gave a paper entitled “The History of Pentateuch Redaction and the Development of Sacerdotal Institutions.” His thesis was that we have to pay attention to the priesthood at the same time as we focus on the development of the Torah. Although he focused on the exilic and postexilic periods, I am currently considering the same issue for the preexilic period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; The Best Biblioblogging of 2006</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-9375</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; The Best Biblioblogging of 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-9375</guid>
		<description>[...] Tyler Williams &#8212; the hardest working man in biblioblogging &#8212; has pulled together a list of the best biblioblog entries from 2006.Â  He breaks everything down on a month by month basis, giving what he thinks was the best post from that month as well as some runners up.Â  I am pleased to say that my post on Priests and the Pentateuch was named the best post from December. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tyler Williams &#8212; the hardest working man in biblioblogging &#8212; has pulled together a list of the best biblioblog entries from 2006.Â  He breaks everything down on a month by month basis, giving what he thinks was the best post from that month as well as some runners up.Â  I am pleased to say that my post on Priests and the Pentateuch was named the best post from December. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival - Best of 2006</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-8971</link>
		<dc:creator>Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival - Best of 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-8971</guid>
		<description>[...] Finally we come to December. Since the most recent Biblical Studies Carnival covered this month, I will only highlight what I thought was the best post of the month: Kevin Wilson&#8217;s â€œPriests and the Pentateuchâ€ over at Blue Cord. In this post, Kevin explores the question of the relationship between the pentateuchal sources and the history of the priesthood and suggests â€” rather provocatively â€” that the P source may in fact be one of the earliest sources to the Pentateuch, rather than the latest (Wellhausen says, Nein!). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Finally we come to December. Since the most recent Biblical Studies Carnival covered this month, I will only highlight what I thought was the best post of the month: Kevin Wilson&#8217;s â€œPriests and the Pentateuchâ€ over at Blue Cord. In this post, Kevin explores the question of the relationship between the pentateuchal sources and the history of the priesthood and suggests â€” rather provocatively â€” that the P source may in fact be one of the earliest sources to the Pentateuch, rather than the latest (Wellhausen says, Nein!). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival XIII</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-8696</link>
		<dc:creator>Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biblical Studies Carnival XIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2006/12/priests-and-the-pentateuch/#comment-8696</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving from the sons of God to the sons of Aaron, Kevin Wilson over at Blue Cord has a post musing about the history of the priesthood in ancient Israel. His post, &#8220;Priests and the Pentateuch&#8221; explores the question of the relationship between the pentateuchal sources and the history of the priesthood; Wilson suggests &#8212; rather provocatively &#8212; that the P source may in fact be one of the earliest sources to the Pentateuch, rather than the latest (Wellhausen says, Nein!). Also of note is Kevin&#8217;s in-depth multipart review of the latest SBL Symposium series volume, A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation, edited by Thomas B. Dozeman and Konrad Schmid (Society of Biblical Literature, 2006; Buy from Amazon.ca or Amazon.com). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Moving from the sons of God to the sons of Aaron, Kevin Wilson over at Blue Cord has a post musing about the history of the priesthood in ancient Israel. His post, &#8220;Priests and the Pentateuch&#8221; explores the question of the relationship between the pentateuchal sources and the history of the priesthood; Wilson suggests &#8212; rather provocatively &#8212; that the P source may in fact be one of the earliest sources to the Pentateuch, rather than the latest (Wellhausen says, Nein!). Also of note is Kevin&#8217;s in-depth multipart review of the latest <acronym title="Society of Biblical Literature">SBL</acronym> Symposium series volume, A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation, edited by Thomas B. Dozeman and Konrad Schmid (Society of Biblical Literature, 2006; Buy from Amazon.ca or Amazon.com). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
