Chris Heard at Higgaion has posted some of his pet peeves. Since I am simultaneously snowed in and bored with proofreading the New Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, I thought I would offer some of my pet peeves. A few are academic, while others are more general. Most pertain to language, but a few other things slipped in. It is just a short list of things up with which I will not put.
- Using the word “methodology” when what you mean is “method.” This happens in academic circles all the time. You can hear it in almost every session at the SBL. A method is a procedure you follow. Methodology is the study of method. You cannot apply a methodology.
- “Beg the question” - to beg the question means to assume what you are trying to prove as part of your argument. It is an informal fallacy in logic. “Begging the question” does not mean that a particular question needs to be asked, but this is how it is constantly used.
- PIN number - you do not have a PIN number. PIN means “Personal Identification Number.” Number is already a part of PIN, so you don’t have to say it again. This goes for ATM machine as well. ATM stands for “Automatic Teller Machine.” Machine is already in there. So please, for God’s sake, stop telling me you are going to the ATM machine to input your PIN number.
- Irregardless - this is not a word.
- Express checkout lanes - no, this is not about people who get in express lanes with too many items, although that frosts my shorts as well. Instead, it is about the sign over the lane that says, “Twelve Items or Less.” Items can be counted. Therefore, it should read “Twelve Items or Fewer.”
- Canadians. ‘Nuff said.
- Reckless creation of denominative verbs - this seems particularly common in the business world. We don’t agendize things; we put them on the agenda.
- Quotation marks for emphasis - “Extra” low prices; Get the “best” bargain in town!; This sale only runs until “Saturday.” It is like there is an epidemic of non-referenced quotations. Who said the prices were “extra” low? Use bold if you want to emphasize. The rampant use of scare quotes is bad enough. Let’s not expand quotation marks to emphasis.
- People who don’t understand adverbs and adjectives - you do not “feel badly,” unless of course your tactile senses are not functioning properly. You “feel bad.” Verbs of perception take adjectives to describe the state your are perceiving.
- People who dress up their dogs.
One thing that probably should be a pet peeve but isn’t is the use of the word “hopefully.” To do something hopefully is to do it expectantly, e.g., “He waited hopefully.” It does not mean that the speaker is hoping that something will happen. “Hopefully, he waited” does not mean “I hope he waited.” What should be said is, “It is to be hoped that he waited.” Despite this, I still can’t bring myself to use “It is to be hoped . . .” in everyday conversation, and I am sure it peeves someone else’s pet out there.
On February 15th, 2007 at 2:02 am
I can’t believe you are putting Canadians in the same category of people who dress up their dogs!
Just remember what us Canadians did to you guys in 1812.
On February 15th, 2007 at 2:25 am
Are you kidding? I still haven’t forgiven you for what you did in 1992 when Toronto won the World Series!
On February 15th, 2007 at 9:29 am
[…] Goodacre and Kevin Wilson have both posted lists of their pet peeves. Here are a few of […]
On February 15th, 2007 at 10:05 am
If you haven’t already done so, you should get a copy of “Eats shoots and Leaves” by Lynn Truss. You will love it.
On February 15th, 2007 at 10:47 am
In RE “irregardless”, I saw a funny use of it in a TV show. One character used the word in the typical erroneous way and was told “That’s not even a word!”
He responded very quickly: “Yes it is! It means ‘without lack of regard!’ “.
On February 15th, 2007 at 10:51 am
Hmmm… I think I’m developing a new pet peeve regarding Americans who use “‘Nuff said”…
On February 15th, 2007 at 3:36 pm
[…] my placing Canadians on my pet peeves list has cause a bit of a stir north of the border. They were so angry that they were getting reading […]
On February 17th, 2007 at 1:51 pm
I really dislike the term “irregardless,” but, unfortunately, it IS a word. Look it up. It is a redundant word since it has the same meaning as “regardless,” but it’s even in the OED. It’s like “flammable,” and “inflammable,” which also both mean the same thing. ARRRGH!
On February 17th, 2007 at 4:31 pm
I do realize it is in the OED, but it is still a pet peeve, just because of its double negation.
On August 23rd, 2007 at 10:58 am
[…] in February, I wrote a post on pet peeves. It turned out to be a rather popular post with a good number of comments. In the intervening […]
On April 9th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
[…] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of […]
On April 10th, 2008 at 10:51 am
[…] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of […]
On December 28th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
We laughed. Thanks penis tattoo to me until now he was coming and she.
On February 17th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
It really happened the financial kendra wilkinson forum district of the.
On March 17th, 2009 at 3:35 am
jessica alba barefoot