Comments on: Pet Peeves http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/ A biblioblog Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:52:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Blue Cord » Illuminating Leviticus http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-47654 Blue Cord » Illuminating Leviticus Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:51:41 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-47654 [...] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of [...] […] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of […]

]]> By: Blue Cord » Illiminating Leviticus http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-47583 Blue Cord » Illiminating Leviticus Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:19:35 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-47583 [...] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of [...] […] I would not say that historical-critical methods (not “methodologies”!) have yielded unsatisfactory results, I am always open to a new theory. But just on the basis of […]

]]> By: Blue Cord » More Pet Peeves http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-26294 Blue Cord » More Pet Peeves Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:58:37 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-26294 [...] in February, I wrote a post on pet peeves. It turned out to be a rather popular post with a good number of comments. In the intervening [...] […] in February, I wrote a post on pet peeves. It turned out to be a rather popular post with a good number of comments. In the intervening […]

]]> By: Kevin A. Wilson http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9954 Kevin A. Wilson Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:31:45 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9954 I do realize it is in the OED, but it is still a pet peeve, just because of its double negation. I do realize it is in the OED, but it is still a pet peeve, just because of its double negation.

]]> By: Michael Westmoreland-White http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9951 Michael Westmoreland-White Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:51:21 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9951 I really dislike the term "irregardless," but, unfortunately, it IS a word. Look it up. It is a redundant word since it has the same meaning as "regardless," but it's even in the OED. It's like "flammable," and "inflammable," which also both mean the same thing. ARRRGH! I really dislike the term “irregardless,” but, unfortunately, it IS a word. Look it up. It is a redundant word since it has the same meaning as “regardless,” but it’s even in the OED. It’s like “flammable,” and “inflammable,” which also both mean the same thing. ARRRGH!

]]> By: Blue Cord » Canadians, eh? http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9905 Blue Cord » Canadians, eh? Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:36:47 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9905 [...] my placing Canadians on my pet peeves list has cause a bit of a stir north of the border.  They were so angry that they were getting reading [...] […] my placing Canadians on my pet peeves list has cause a bit of a stir north of the border.  They were so angry that they were getting reading […]

]]> By: Michael Pahl http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9891 Michael Pahl Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:51:01 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9891 Hmmm... I think I'm developing a new pet peeve regarding Americans who use "'Nuff said"... ;-) Hmmm… I think I’m developing a new pet peeve regarding Americans who use “‘Nuff said”… ;-)

]]> By: romzburg http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9890 romzburg Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:47:10 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9890 In RE "irregardless", I saw a funny use of it in a TV show. One character used the word in the typical erroneous way and was told "That's not even a word!" He responded very quickly: "Yes it is! It means 'without lack of regard!' ". In RE “irregardless”, I saw a funny use of it in a TV show. One character used the word in the typical erroneous way and was told “That’s not even a word!”

He responded very quickly: “Yes it is! It means ‘without lack of regard!’ “.

]]> By: George http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9889 George Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:05:50 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9889 If you haven't already done so, you should get a copy of "Eats shoots and Leaves" by Lynn Truss. You will love it. If you haven’t already done so, you should get a copy of “Eats shoots and Leaves” by Lynn Truss. You will love it.

]]> By: alastair.adversaria » Pet Peeves http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9888 alastair.adversaria » Pet Peeves Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:29:40 +0000 http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/pet-peeves/#comment-9888 [...] Goodacre and Kevin Wilson have both posted lists of their pet peeves. Here are a few of [...] […] Goodacre and Kevin Wilson have both posted lists of their pet peeves. Here are a few of […]

]]>