<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The So-Called Jesus Tomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin A. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10191</guid>
		<description>Stating that he stands by his claim can hardly be described as being a zealot about it.  To the best of my knowledge, the Israel Antiquities Department has never said why it concluded the James Ossuary is a forgery.  Perhaps it is; perhaps it isn't.  Scholars must decide that for themselves.

Scholarship is not about cutting anyone slack.  It is about examining the evidence and making conclusions.  If Witherington has decided that the Jesus Tomb documentary is full of holes, then he is certainly entitled to say as much.

In addition, Jacobovici seems to agree that the James Ossuary is genuine, since he includes it as part of the evidence that the Talpiot Tomb belonged to Jesus of Nazareth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stating that he stands by his claim can hardly be described as being a zealot about it.  To the best of my knowledge, the Israel Antiquities Department has never said why it concluded the James Ossuary is a forgery.  Perhaps it is; perhaps it isn&#8217;t.  Scholars must decide that for themselves.</p>
<p>Scholarship is not about cutting anyone slack.  It is about examining the evidence and making conclusions.  If Witherington has decided that the Jesus Tomb documentary is full of holes, then he is certainly entitled to say as much.</p>
<p>In addition, Jacobovici seems to agree that the James Ossuary is genuine, since he includes it as part of the evidence that the Talpiot Tomb belonged to Jesus of Nazareth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10189</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10189</guid>
		<description>I guess it is true that a prophet has no honor in his own country. 

So far, only the press in Witherington's native Kentucky have delicately raised the issue of the  pot calling the kettle bla...that is, the  pot calling the ossuary cracked in Witheringtonâ€™s overheated (the gentleman protests too much) protestations against the latest â€œbiggest New Testament findâ€* in his lifetime.


Lexington County Herald, 2/27/07
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/news/nation/16791591.htm

On his blog, Witherington fired a final salvo by referring to the Titanic and saying Cameron "has now jumped on board another sinking ship full of holes, presumably in order to make a lot of money before the theory sinks into an early watery grave. Man the lifeboats and get out now."

In 2003, Witherington and co-author Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, wrote in The Brother of Jesus that they believed an ossuary bearing the inscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus," was authentic.
A few months after The Brother of Jesus was published, Israel's Antiquities Authority decided that the ossuary was a fake. It charged the ossuary's owner, Oded Golan, with fraud and illegally selling archaeological artifacts outside of Israel. His trial continues, 21/2 years after it began.

Witherington said that he and Shanks stand by their conclusion that the ossuary is authentic and are not likely to change their minds, regardless of the trial's outcome.
-----
* "This is probably going to be the biggest New Testament find in my lifetime, as big as the Dead Sea scrolls," said Ben Witherington, a New Testament professor at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. 
	
National Geographic News
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1021_021021_christianrelicbox.html
-----

If Witherington can be such a zealot about HIS OWN wacky claims about HIS OWN phony ossuary, it would only seem sporting that he would cut Simcha Jacobovici (Witheringtonâ€™s former partner in crime. He was the man who helped Witherington hype his own phony â€œJames Ossuaryâ€ about 4 years ago.) and James Cameron some slack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it is true that a prophet has no honor in his own country. </p>
<p>So far, only the press in Witherington&#8217;s native Kentucky have delicately raised the issue of the  pot calling the kettle bla&#8230;that is, the  pot calling the ossuary cracked in Witheringtonâ€™s overheated (the gentleman protests too much) protestations against the latest â€œbiggest New Testament findâ€* in his lifetime.</p>
<p>Lexington County Herald, 2/27/07<br />
<a href="http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/news/nation/16791591.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/news/nation/16791591.htm</a></p>
<p>On his blog, Witherington fired a final salvo by referring to the Titanic and saying Cameron &#8220;has now jumped on board another sinking ship full of holes, presumably in order to make a lot of money before the theory sinks into an early watery grave. Man the lifeboats and get out now.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2003, Witherington and co-author Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, wrote in The Brother of Jesus that they believed an ossuary bearing the inscription &#8220;James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,&#8221; was authentic.<br />
A few months after The Brother of Jesus was published, Israel&#8217;s Antiquities Authority decided that the ossuary was a fake. It charged the ossuary&#8217;s owner, Oded Golan, with fraud and illegally selling archaeological artifacts outside of Israel. His trial continues, 21/2 years after it began.</p>
<p>Witherington said that he and Shanks stand by their conclusion that the ossuary is authentic and are not likely to change their minds, regardless of the trial&#8217;s outcome.<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
* &#8220;This is probably going to be the biggest New Testament find in my lifetime, as big as the Dead Sea scrolls,&#8221; said Ben Witherington, a New Testament professor at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. </p>
<p>National Geographic News<br />
<a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1021_021021_christianrelicbox.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1021_021021_christianrelicbox.html</a><br />
&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>If Witherington can be such a zealot about HIS OWN wacky claims about HIS OWN phony ossuary, it would only seem sporting that he would cut Simcha Jacobovici (Witheringtonâ€™s former partner in crime. He was the man who helped Witherington hype his own phony â€œJames Ossuaryâ€ about 4 years ago.) and James Cameron some slack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin A. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10186</guid>
		<description>I took a look at www.jesusfamilytomb.com mentioned above.  The site is a monument to form triumphing over substance.  The graphics and layout are beautiful.  The content is pretty lame.

If you want DaVinci Code, Knights Templar, Freemasons, and other ridiculous theories, this is a site for you.  All are mentioned, and the authors manage to connect them with the Talpiot tomb.

But if you look for logic, you are in serious trouble.  Take, for example, this quote from the site: "It requires a flight or two of fancy, but if we connect a few dots we can draw a line through history from the tomb straight to today."  For those who are unwilling to engage in flights of fancy but prefer serious scholarship, their ideas have no basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at <a href="http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com</a> mentioned above.  The site is a monument to form triumphing over substance.  The graphics and layout are beautiful.  The content is pretty lame.</p>
<p>If you want DaVinci Code, Knights Templar, Freemasons, and other ridiculous theories, this is a site for you.  All are mentioned, and the authors manage to connect them with the Talpiot tomb.</p>
<p>But if you look for logic, you are in serious trouble.  Take, for example, this quote from the site: &#8220;It requires a flight or two of fancy, but if we connect a few dots we can draw a line through history from the tomb straight to today.&#8221;  For those who are unwilling to engage in flights of fancy but prefer serious scholarship, their ideas have no basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Jones</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10185</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10185</guid>
		<description>Christ Tomb. What can be more controversal and have legs to run for a long time, perhaps forever.

I jumped in and got the domain name ChristsTomb.com and now don't know what to do.
If anyone is interested in a joint venture or whatever: MyManJones@gmail.com . I really do not think folks believe this yet. I mean look at the Shroud Of Turin and how long it has been studied and debated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ Tomb. What can be more controversal and have legs to run for a long time, perhaps forever.</p>
<p>I jumped in and got the domain name ChristsTomb.com and now don&#8217;t know what to do.<br />
If anyone is interested in a joint venture or whatever: <a href="mailto:MyManJones@gmail.com">MyManJones@gmail.com</a> . I really do not think folks believe this yet. I mean look at the Shroud Of Turin and how long it has been studied and debated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10180</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/02/the-so-called-jesus-tomb/#comment-10180</guid>
		<description>Here's the official site for those interested:
www.jesusfamilytomb.com

There's original interview footage and articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the official site for those interested:<br />
<a href="http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s original interview footage and articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
