The Associated Press is reporting that an amateur scholar has come up with yet another theory about Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper painting. The scholar, Slavisa Pesci, says that superimposing a horizontally reverses image of The Last Supper on itself reveals several images, including Jesus blessing the bread, a baby being held in the arms of one of the men, and a Templar knight. A number of sites are carrying the article, but here is a link to the MSNBC version of the AP story.

When the story broke, so many people rushed to several Da Vinci sites that those sites crashed. I could not find Pesci’s image, but I found a similar picture done by someone else that was available in Wikipedia’s image section. I have circled the relevant areas and included that picture here (click on the image to view a larger version).

The apostle who is supposedly holding the baby looks more like he is strangling one of the other disciples, while the figure on the far left looks vaguely like a knight (though not necessarily of the Templar order). With Jesus in the middle holding out his arms, it is easy to see how him holding out both arms in to the side looks similar to paintings of Jesus blessing people (the reversal makes both palms appear to be facing upwards). The patterns in Jesus’s clothes also maybe sorta possibly look like a chalice.

While I am far from convinced by looking at the picture, I have not read Pesci’s arguments (I can’t find them online). It would not be surprising for da Vinci to do something like this. He enjoyed this kind of fun with mathematics. It has been suggested, for instance, that da Vinci used a mirror image of himself as part of the model for La Joconde (a.k.a., Mona Lisa). But this implies that da Vinci could imagine someone looking at his painting, mentally reversing it, and superimposing a semitransparent version of the reversal back onto the original painting. Perhaps da Vinci could perform such a mental trick, but I doubt many others could, even if the idea of doing it occurred to them. If it were a hidden message, it was a hidden message only he could read.1

Of course, even if it turns out the Pesci is correct, none of this adds any evidence to the odd theories that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had a child whose descendants are protected by the Knights Templar. All it would show is that da Vinci thought that they did, and da Vinci had access to far less historical material than we do. Even if he were a member of some secret society, there is no reason to think that the secret society had better historical information. Secret societies have secret information, but just because something is a secret does not mean it is correct.


  1. Very few people in da Vinci’s day possessed the kind of technology that would allow them to superimpose transparent images on each other. Remember, back then computers took up an entire room and were much too expensive for individuals to own. [back]