<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Sources of the Pentateuch&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; Bloggers in the SBL Forum</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-31346</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; Bloggers in the SBL Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-31346</guid>
		<description>[...] of Ehud Ben Zvi&#8217;s article on the Journal of Hebrew Scripture.  Because I had written a response to Alan Hauser&#8217;s article on source criticism, I sent an e-mail to the address at the bottom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of Ehud Ben Zvi&#8217;s article on the Journal of Hebrew Scripture.  Because I had written a response to Alan Hauser&#8217;s article on source criticism, I sent an e-mail to the address at the bottom [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Cord &#187; Glynn on Hauser on Source Criticism</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-30841</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Cord &#187; Glynn on Hauser on Source Criticism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-30841</guid>
		<description>[...] article is a good one, and it certainly deserves engagement. I posted my own critique of Hauser&#8217;s essay last week. Unfortunately, Glynn&#8217;s response to the article can serve only as an example of how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] article is a good one, and it certainly deserves engagement. I posted my own critique of Hauser&#8217;s essay last week. Unfortunately, Glynn&#8217;s response to the article can serve only as an example of how [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-30378</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2007/10/sources-of-the-pentateuch/#comment-30378</guid>
		<description>Aren't you over-simplifying Childs? Doesn't his approach to canonical shaping precisely allow for source etc. historico-critical "results" to impact the reading of text as canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you over-simplifying Childs? Doesn&#8217;t his approach to canonical shaping precisely allow for source etc. historico-critical &#8220;results&#8221; to impact the reading of text as canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
