<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Temple Seal Found</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/01/second-temple-seal-found/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/01/second-temple-seal-found/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jin</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/01/second-temple-seal-found/#comment-40612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/01/second-temple-seal-found/#comment-40612</guid>
		<description>Kevin,
Thank you for your comments on the seal.

You're right!
This seal cannot be related to any biblcial names since she's not provided any resonable evidences.  

But think of the issue of the date, as you said in the very begining of your comments: the date of the seal would be to 538–445 B.C.E. presumably based on the stratum in which the seal was found.

If this date is correct, what does this seal tell us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
Thank you for your comments on the seal.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right!<br />
This seal cannot be related to any biblcial names since she&#8217;s not provided any resonable evidences.  </p>
<p>But think of the issue of the date, as you said in the very begining of your comments: the date of the seal would be to 538–445 B.C.E. presumably based on the stratum in which the seal was found.</p>
<p>If this date is correct, what does this seal tell us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
