<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Was Jesus&#8217; Resurrection a Sequel?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/07/was-jesus-resurrection-a-sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/07/was-jesus-resurrection-a-sequel/</link>
	<description>A biblioblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weekly News and Views from Cyberspace 7/11 &#171; The Church of Jesus Christ</title>
		<link>http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/2008/07/was-jesus-resurrection-a-sequel/#comment-60261</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly News and Views from Cyberspace 7/11 &#171; The Church of Jesus Christ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecord.org/biblioblog/?p=602#comment-60261</guid>
		<description>[...] conjecture, but this stone seems to tesitfy to the tradition from a non-canonical source. Here is a blog that discusses some of it. This blogger makes an interesting point as well. For me, it is interesting to see the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] conjecture, but this stone seems to tesitfy to the tradition from a non-canonical source. Here is a blog that discusses some of it. This blogger makes an interesting point as well. For me, it is interesting to see the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
